There are two parallel tracks - open titles and women's titles - and the women's thresholds sit roughly 200 rating points below the corresponding open ones.
| Title | Rating threshold | Norms needed |
|---|---|---|
| Grandmaster (GM) | 2500 | yes |
| International Master (IM) | 2400 | yes |
| FIDE Master (FM) | 2300 | no |
| Candidate Master (CM) | 2200 | no |
| Woman Grandmaster (WGM) | 2300 | yes |
| Woman International Master (WIM) | 2200 | yes |
| Woman FIDE Master (WFM) | 2100 | no |
| Woman Candidate Master (WCM) | 2000 | no |
The two lower titles need only the rating threshold to have been reached. The two upper ones need norms as well - which is the part that takes years.
Women may hold open titles too, and many do: the women's track does not replace the open one, it runs alongside it - why the separate track exists.
A norm is a single tournament performance at the level of the title, achieved under conditions strict enough that it cannot be arranged conveniently.
So the title needs two different achievements: results good enough for norms, and a rating high enough for the threshold. People frequently have one without the other for years - how ratings move.
A norm counts only if the event itself qualifies - which is why an ordinary strong open may produce none at all.
The precise figures and deadlines are set out in the FIDE handbook and are revised from time to time - check the current edition rather than any article, this one included.
The commonest source of confusion: a grandmaster rated 2380 and an untitled player rated 2450 in the same tournament. Both situations are normal.
Practical consequence for an organizer: a title tells you what somebody once did, and a current rating tells you how they are playing now. For seeding a tournament, use the rating.
Alongside the international titles most federations run their own ladder of ranks or categories, and the two systems are frequently mixed up.
For an amateur playing club events, neither system applies until the events themselves are rated and reported - which is a separate decision for the organizer.
Playing titles are not the only ones. Two other families exist and are earned quite differently.
A practical note for organizers: if you want your events to be rated or to count towards anything, the requirement you meet first is usually the arbiter, not the players.
Grandmaster, International Master, FIDE Master and Candidate Master, with rating thresholds of 2500, 2400, 2300 and 2200. There is a parallel women's track with thresholds roughly 200 points lower. The two lower titles need only the rating; the two upper ones also need norms.
A single tournament performance at the level of the title - roughly 2600 for a grandmaster norm - usually over nine games, in an event that meets strict conditions. Several norms are needed, plus the rating threshold reached at some point.
A required share of titled opponents, opponents from several federations, a classical time control, registration with FIDE in advance, and an appropriately qualified arbiter. An event registered afterwards produces no norms whatever happened in it.
Because a title is held for life and records what somebody achieved once, while a rating moves with form, age and time away from the game. Touching the threshold for a single rating period is enough for that condition to be met permanently.
No. Norms come only from classical chess, however strong a rapid or blitz result is. Rapid and blitz have their own ratings but do not contribute to titles.
No. Most federations run their own ladder under their own rules, and it does not convert into international titles by any formula. National ranks matter locally - for domestic entry, coaching qualifications and junior selection.
No arbiter skills required. The app takes over the part that usually stops people from running tournaments at all: who plays whom in each round and who finishes first.
The bot is constantly improved based on real tournaments. If you need a feature that isn't there yet, message the developers right inside the bot with the /support command. Many features appeared exactly because organizers asked for them, and useful ideas get added quickly.
Reference - the Elo rating, tie-breaks, glossary, women's titles and events.